Accounting History

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Baker, C. R.
Right arrow Articles by Prentice, D.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Accounting History, Vol. 13, No. 2, 163-182 (2008)
DOI: 10.1177/1032373207088177

The origins of auditor liability to third parties under United States common law

C. Richard Baker

Adelphi University, Baker3{at}Adelphi.edu

Deborah Prentice

North Carolina A&T State University, dprentic{at}ncat.edu

This article traces the origins of auditor liability to third parties under United States common law, with a particular emphasis on the role of Benjamin Cardozo as Chief Judge of the New York Court of Appeals in the period from 1917 to 1932. Prior to the Ultramares decision, written by Chief Judge Cardozo in 1931, auditors were relatively shielded from liability against lawsuits brought by third parties (those who are not the client). In the Ultramares decision, Cardozo opened the door to a possible expansion of auditor liability to third parties through the introduction of a relatively new theory of law, that is that an auditor's negligence was heedless to such an extent that it was equivalent to fraud (that is, gross negligence). Subsequent to Ultramares, it appeared likely that the liability of auditors for negligent acts would be extended beyond their clients to the third parties who rely upon audited financial statements. However, because Ultramares has been interpreted in various ways in different jurisdictions, there has been ambiguity about the exact parameters of auditor liability to third parties under common law. Nevertheless, the Ultramares decision can be identified as the first instance in the United States where the courts opened up the possibility for third parties to sue auditors for negligent acts that were perceived to be so flagrant as to be equivalent to fraud.

Key Words: Auditors' liability to third parties • history of auditor negligence


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?