Accounting History

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Register here to gain access to SAGE's 500+ Journals Online

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fleischman, R. K.
Right arrow Articles by Tyson, T. N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Accounting History, Vol. 1, No. 1, 55-75 (1996)
DOI: 10.1177/103237329600100104

A theoretical primer for evaluating and conducting historical research in accounting

Richard K. Fleischman

John Carroll University

Patti A. Mills

Indiana State University

Thomas N. Tyson

St. John Fisher College

Historical research in accounting is flourishing as prestigious journals worldwide encourage authors to incorporate history into their submissions. Although a number of accounting academics are aware of these opportunities, others may be reluctant to participate because they lack an understanding of the rudiments of historical scholarship. This paper is geared to those scholars who seek to write about accounting's past but are unacquainted with historical methods, unsure how to begin, and generally unfamiliar with the debates that are now taking place in the field.

In this paper we discuss the formal theoretical structures of history as a discipline; differentiate history as event, story, and way of knowing; consider the problem of historical facticity and the subjectivity of the historian; examine the role historical evidence plays in the reconstruction of the past, and identify the forms of historical construction and alternate historical methods. We also distinguish between history and social science and summarise the current debate between conventional and critical accounting historians. Publication possibilities are also addressed.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Accounting HistoryHome page
A. J. Richardson
Strategies in the development of accounting history as an academic discipline
Accounting History, August 1, 2008; 13(3): 247 - 280.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Accounting HistoryHome page
B. Williams and G. Wines
The first 10 years of Accounting History as an international refereed journal: 1996-2005
Accounting History, November 1, 2006; 11(4): 419 - 445.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Accounting HistoryHome page
M. Sargiacomo
Using accounting records to enhance an understanding of a seventeenth-century Italian feudal community: the case of the Commune of Penne (1664-90)
Accounting History, November 1, 2006; 11(4): 475 - 502.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Accounting HistoryHome page
A. J. Robb, Y. P. Shanahan, and B. R. Lord
Ernest Adams Ltd: the demise of a family business
Accounting History, August 1, 2006; 11(3): 357 - 379.
[Abstract] [PDF]