Accounting History

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Roy, S. P.
Right arrow Articles by Spraakman, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Accounting History, Vol. 1, No. 2, 55-78 (1996)
DOI: 10.1177/103237329600100204
© 1996 SAGE Publications

Transaction cost economics and nineteenth century fur trade accounting: relevance of a contemporary theory

S. Paul Roy

Schulich School of Business, York University

Gary Spraakman

Atkinson College, York University

In examining how the historical, fur-trading Hudson's Bay Company (HBC) controlled the agency problem, Carlos and Nicholas (1990) concluded that accounting in general was one of the many techniques used. This study expands on the work of Carlos and Nicholas. For the period from 1821 to 1860, it examines original documents in addition to published documents used by Carlos and Nicholas. It uses a specific agency theorytransaction cost economics (TCE). Because of the uncertainty that prevailed through communication lags caused by the great distances, TCE suggests that the HBC would develop extensive directing and monitoring mechanisms and use what is now known as management accounting. The data suggest that the HBC conformed well to the TCE predictions that directing and monitoring mechanisms would be highly developed. The internal accounting had many features comparable to contemporary management accounting.

Key Words: Fur trade accounting • transaction cost economics • Hudson's Bay Company


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Accounting HistoryHome page
B. N. Potter
The Louis Goldberg Collection at Deakin University: exploring a rich foundation for historical research
Accounting History, November 1, 2003; 8(2): 9 - 34.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Accounting HistoryHome page
M. Christensen
Accrual accounting in the public sector: the case of the New South Wales government
Accounting History, November 1, 2002; 7(2): 93 - 124.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Accounting HistoryHome page
C. J. Napier
Accounting history and accounting progress
Accounting History, November 1, 2001; 6(2): 7 - 31.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Accounting HistoryHome page
G. Spraakman and A. Wilkie
The development of management accounting at the Hudsonis Bay Company, 1670-1820
Accounting History, May 1, 2000; 5(1): 59 - 84.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Accounting HistoryHome page
L. D. Parker
Historiography for the new millennium: adventures in accounting and management
Accounting History, November 1, 1999; 4(2): 11 - 42.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Accounting HistoryHome page
G. Spraakman and R. Davidson
Transaction cost economics as a predictor of management accounting practices at the Hudson's Bay Company, 1860 to 1914
Accounting History, November 1, 1998; 3(2): 69 - 101.
[Abstract] [PDF]