This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Heier, J. R. Articles by Sayers, D. L. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

A century of debate for internal controls and their assessment: a study of reactive evolution

Auburn University Montgomery, jheier{at}mail.aum.edu

Michael T. Dugan

The University of Alabama

David L. Sayers

Auburn University Montgomery

In July 2002, the United States Congress passed the Sarbanes-Oxley Act in an effort to assuage the public outrage over the lax regulatory oversight in light of the high-profile financial scandals. It was hoped that the act would calm the fears of investors and bring confidence back to corporate reporting through a mandated internal control review process. Though the impact of the act on audit procedures and internal control development will be studied for many years, it may be simply one of many developments in the evolution of internal control theory and practice that had occurred over the previous century. Like Sarbanes-Oxley, many of the changes in internal control procedures were a reaction to an event that identified a weakness in current practice. This evolution of the internal control process, as seen through the many laws, regulations and pronouncements of the previous century, has been, in the main, a reactive one resulting from inadequate control measures.

Key Words: Internal control • administrative controls • accounting controls • SAS No.55 • SAS No.78 • SAS No.82 • control risk • control environment • control procedures • fraud • errors and irregularities • accounting irregularities • audit integrity • Sarbanes-Oxley

Accounting History, Vol. 10, No. 3, 39-70 (2005)
DOI: 10.1177/103237320501000303


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?